site stats

Cit v shaw wallace

WebCommissioner Of Income-Tax, Bengal v. Shaw Wallace And Company Sir George Lowndes.- This is an appeal from a judgment of the High Court at Calcutta delivered on a reference made to it under S. 66, Indian Income-tax Act, 11 of 1922. WebShaw Wallace & Co. Ltd., the assessee, was at the material time the holding company in respect of the following subsidiary companies holding 100% of the shares of the later : (a) Atlas Fertilisers Ltd.; (b) Bengal Distilleries Co. Ltd., and (c) Indo-Agri. Ltd.

Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bengal v. Shaw Wallace And …

WebShaw Wallace & Co. Ltd. Sabyasachi Mukharji, J.:— The assessee is a company. The assessment year involved is 1963-64, and the relevant accounting year ended on December 31, 1962. The assessee-company received a net dividend of Rs. 2,29,948 from certain companies in the United Kingdom and Ceylon. WebJul 29, 2003 · ALTAMAS KABIR, J. (1) AS the appeal involves a question of law, on consent of the parties the appeal itself was taken up for consideration along with the application … the jihadis next door https://liveloveboat.com

The Commissioner Of ... vs Messrs. Vazir Sultan & Sons on 20 …

WebIn CIT, Bengal v Shaw Wallace & Co (1932) the definition of income is as follows: “….income connotes a periodical monetary return coming in with some sort of regularity, … WebIn Maharajkumar Gopal Saran Narain Singh v. CIT I.T. Act, even though the annuity did not constitute or provide a profit or gain to the assessee. After referring to the aforesaid decision of the Privy Council in the case of Shaw Wallace & Co., their Lordship observed as follows (p. 242) : "The word 'income' is not limited by the words 'profits ... WebS. Subramanian v.CIT (2004 )186 CTR 286 /136 Taxman 653 (Mad) Satyabir Singh v. CIT (2001) 248 ITR 785 (P&H) ... ACIT (1999) 239 ITR 337 (Bom.) Shaw Wallace & Co Ltd v. CTO (1996) 100 STC 270 (AP) III. Recovery proceedings after assessment . 1. Who can be declared as “ Assessee in default” Recovery proceedings can be taken only in cases ... the jills wisconsin

Commissioner Of Income Tax, ... vs Straw Board Manufacturing Co.

Category:Solved In CIT, Bengal v Shaw Wallace & Co (1932) the Chegg.com

Tags:Cit v shaw wallace

Cit v shaw wallace

Commissioner Of Income-Tax, West Bengal-Iii v. Shaw Wallace …

WebIn CIT v. P. Ali Kunju, M. A. Nazir Cashew Industries [1987] 166 ITR 611, the Kerala High Court referred to the amendment made in Section 36 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, by the … WebIn CIT v. Shaw Wallace and Co. Ltd. the Calcutta High Court followed the decision rendered in the case of CIT v. Peerless Consultancy Services (Pvt.) Ltd. (supra). Against the decision of the Calcutta High Court in the case of CIT v.

Cit v shaw wallace

Did you know?

WebIndian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law WebThe Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Shaw, Wallace And Co. on 14 March, 1932 Wallace Brothers And Co. Ltd. vs The Commissioner Of Income-Tax on 17 February, 1948 Section 6 in The Income- Tax Act, 1995 Citedby 194 docs - [View All] C.W. Spencer vs The Income-Tax Officer on 24 April, 1956

WebOct 1, 2024 · Posts tagged "CIT vs Shaw Wallace and Co." Show Sidebar. Close. Latest Post. In respect of agreement to ... December 22, 2024 Expenditure is not debited to ... WebMay 24, 2024 · CIT (A) decided the issue in favour of assessee. Tribunal rejected the contention of assessee as regards computation of capital gains on the basis that 50 per …

Webv. Shaw, Wallace And Company (High Court Of Judicature At Bombay) No. 14-03-1932. George Lowndes, J. [1] This is an appeal from a judgment of the High Court at Calcutta delivered on a reference made to it under Section 66 of the Indian Income-tax Act, XI of 1922 The reference arose out of an assessment to income tax upon the respondents for ... WebOct 1, 2024 · Posts tagged "CIT vs Shaw Wallace and Co." Home Income Tax Taxation of Alimony October 1, 2024 0 Comments Taxation of Alimony The judiciary has held that a lump-sum receipt in the form of Alimony will not be taxable in the hands of the recipient whereas monthly alimony payments will be treated as income in the hands of the ...

WebRESPONDENT: STRAW BOARD MANUFACTURING CO. LTD. DATE OF JUDGMENT28/04/1989 BENCH: PATHAK, R.S. (CJ) BENCH: PATHAK, R.S. (CJ) KANIA, M.H. CITATION: 1989 AIR 1490 1989 SCR (2) 772 1989 SCC Supl. (2) 523 JT 1989 (2) 264 1989 SCALE (1)1151 CITATOR INFO : RF 1992 SC1622 (4) ACT: Income Tax Act, …

WebThe definition of "income" in Shaw Wallace & Co.’s case [(1932) 59 I.A. 206] as a "periodical monetary return ’coming in’ with some sort of regularity, or expected regularity, from definite sources " must be read with reference to the particular facts of that case and is not applicable to receipts, of this nature. the jikei university kashiwa hospitalWebShaw Wallace & Co. Ltd. vs Asstt. Cit on 25 February, 2002. ... CIT v. Shaiv Wallace & Co. Ltd. (2001) 248 ITR 81 (Cal), wherein it was held that an assessment under section 143(3) can be made even where the assessee is to be assessed by way of block assessment for the block period. The ground is, accordingly, rejected. the jill bennett showWebIn CIT, Bengal v Shaw Wallace & Co (1932) the definition of income is as follows: “….income connotes a periodical monetary return coming in with some sort of regularity, … the jills groupWebIn CIT v. Shaw Wallace and Co. , their Lordships of the Privy Council had occasion to consider the scope of the word "income" as the said term was used in the Indian I.T. Act … the jill biden kissthe jills zederWebIn CIT, Bengal v Shaw Wallace & Co (1932) the definition of income is as follows: “….income connotes a periodical monetary return coming in with some sort of regularity, expected regularity, from defined sources.” Corporate income is an income that is derived from its ordinary running of business. It is not a gain from disposal of capital ... the jills miamiWebCIT v. Shaw Wallace Distilleries Ltd. (2024) 277 Taxman 145 (Karn.) (HC) S. 36 (1) (vii) : Bad debt-TDS payment-Sales promoters-Order of Tribunal allowing the claim as bad debt is affirmed. [S. 260A] Dismissing the appeal of the revenue the Court held that the debt was written off as irrevocable in accounts of assessee. the jilly bed